FpML-AWG-Legacy Fwd: [fpml-arch-modelling-wg] Latest version of FpML Modelling WG Discussion do

["Danielle Cauthen" <dcauthen@xxxxxxxx>]

--- In fpml-arch-modelling-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Shaun O'Kane"
<sokane@...> wrote:

The latest version of the discussion document is attached.

The comments have been merged into the text. Please forgive any
omissions etc. and feel free to add to it in the standard way. 

There is some concern that the architecture working group needs to
show progress given the tightness of the Q1 deadline for delivery. As
a result, some comments have been added to the document regarding
priorities etc.

I would like to go through the document point by point at the next
meeting to get some agreement, or to find out where there is
disagreement. Note that Wednesday meeting is probably not the right
time to expound complex argument. It would be better if the discussion
were conducted before hand (eGroups, changes to the discussion
document) and the meeting used to identify issues, and possibly
nominate people for specific tasks.

Apologies if you receive this message twice as I am posting from home
and am having trouble accessing fpml-arch-modelling-wg at eGroups.com

I think we've done pretty well considering the WG is only a week old!

Tx,
Shaun

--- End forwarded message ---



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: Email majordomo@xxxxxxxx with a blank subject line
In the body include the line: unsubscribe awglegacy youremail@address
To view archives: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_awglegacymail/threads.html