FpML-AWG-Legacy Fwd: [fpml-arch-modelling-wg] Re: Class name tags

["Danielle Cauthen" <dcauthen@xxxxxxxx>]

--- In fpml-arch-modelling-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marcus_Rainbow@... wrote:



What we should be designing is an XML standard.  Good XML should
relect the
complexity of the document it encodes -- as simple as possible and no
simpler.

It is also possible to model a document in UML.  As an OO-believer, I
believe
that a good UML model is isomorphic with a good XML model.  However,
this is a
mapping problem, not a problem for FpML.  AIl we should be concerned
with is to
generate good XML.

My feeling is that an argument about whether a date is or is not a
class is not
the right sort of argument.




**********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
> in error please notify the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has 
> been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer
> viruses.
>
**********************************************************************

--- End forwarded message ---



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: Email majordomo@xxxxxxxx with a blank subject line
In the body include the line: unsubscribe awglegacy youremail@address
To view archives: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_awglegacymail/threads.html