|
Participants Christian Unger (BBH) Lucio Iida (BGI) Marie-Paule Dumont (SWIFT) Banu Apers (SWIFT) John Booth (Northern Trust) Brian Lynn (GEM) Mike Fitzgerald (SWIFT) Gary Brown (Hattrick) Henri Pegeron (DTCC) Andrew Jacobs (HandCoded) Marc Gratacos (ISDA), chair Regrets Francoise Massin (SWIFT) 1. Review of actions > IY to propose a message or messages for responding to a
request or a notification, with the ability to: - indicate that the message was received (but not
necessarily processed) - indicate that the message was processed successfully. >> There was a discussion on this. This proposal could
be applied in different business processes and a request message could have a
flag to receive a response (ack). Andrew Jacobs expressed the concern that the
introduction of a message accepted at the same level as the existing business
messages would blur the distinction between the different layers. There should
be a complete business process definition with messages for not continuing the
process. FpML assumes reliable message delivery. We should look at
WS-Reliability standards to see if this could be used in conjunction with FpML
for adding this extra layer of messaging. > MG Check with validation working group on rationale for
not including validation rules for product type scheme. >> TO DO. 2. Generic product (see
updates from Brian) There was agreement on the group to publish the generic
product representation. We’ll send a call for comments to publish it in
version 4.4. 3. Confirmation Choreography (Steve
Ross-Talbot; see email with materials sent by Steve. Please review them before
the meeting) Gary and Steve took the Confirmation process as defined in
the messaging specifications and translate it into CDL. Marc asked the group to
review it and send any comments to the mailing list. 4. AOB None Kind Regards, -Marc +13472846531 |