Sammy Lee
Manager - Collateral Support
GlobeOp Financial
Services
otccollateral@xxxxxxxxxxx
(W) 646-827-1892
(C) 917-302-1523
slee@xxxxxxxxxxx
Peter put together an initial
list of dispute reasons for MC5 and MC6. Please review. We’ll discuss
tomorrow.
From: Walsh, Peter R
[mailto:PRWalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010
10:14 AM
To: Lyteck Lynhiavu;
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Forsythe,
James
Subject: RE: Collateral WG action item: list of dispute reason
codes
Hello
Lyteck,
We discussed the
dispute reasons internally and agreed to limit the initial dispute reasons to
maximize the automation of them into our respective collateral management
platforms. I do not see a need for two lists as we all agreed the
resolution of the disputes fall outside of these messages
Below is a proposed
short list of initial (high level) dispute reasons;
Peter
Walsh • Vice President• State Street Corporation
1776
Heritage Drive, Adams 2NE, North Quincy, MA 02171 T :( 617) 985-2124 F: (617)
769 - 6848 E: prwalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The
information contained in this email and any attachments have been classified as
limited access and/or privileged State Street information/communication and are
intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). If you are not an
intended recipient or a person responsible for delivery to an intended
recipient, please notify the author and destroy this email. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure, retention or distribution of the material in
this email is strictly forbidden. - Thank you.
From: Lyteck Lynhiavu
[mailto:LLynhiavu@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:00
AM
To: Walsh, Peter R;
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Collateral WG action item:
list of dispute reason codes
Peter, Harry:
At the last meeting the group discussed using a combination
of free-form comment field and/or reason code(s) to capture the reason why a
margin call is being disputed.
I have you down for an action item to put together a draft
list of generic reason codes for the MC5 (Full Dispute) & MC6 (Partial
Dispute) messages; one or more standard reason codes would be used in these
messages. (Do you foresee the need for 2 lists/schemes for full and partial
disputes?)
You may reply to me (I can bundle your input) or directly to
the group; it could be presented to the group on Wednesday.
Thanks, Lyteck