[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FPML-CWG Collateral WG Meeting Minutes - September 15, 2010 (updated)




Lyteck,

Regret I have to offer apologies for today's meeting (22 September).

Best regards,
Harry


__________________________________________________________________________
Harry McAllister
| Information Architect | Fixed Income Architecture | BNP Paribas
4R223 | 10 Harewood Avenue | London NW1 6AA
tel
: +44 (0)20 7595 3416 | email :
harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Internet  
LLynhiavu@xxxxxxxx

Sent by: owner-colwg@xxxxxxxx

21/09/2010 20:21

Please respond to
colwg@xxxxxxxx

To
colwg@xxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
FPML-CWG Collateral WG Meeting Minutes - September 15, 2010 (updated)





Please find the minutes for the September 15 meeting. (amended in brown)
 
Participants
1.       Anil Panchal (GlobeOp)
2.       Benjamin Riley + Sam (Deloitte & Touche)
3.       Tom Ciulla (Deloitte & Touche)
4.       Joe Novellino (DB)
5.       Evelyne Piron (SWIFT)
6.       Simone Milani-Foglia (LCH Clearnet)
7.       Irina Yermakova (ISDA)
8.       Lyteck Lynhiavu (ISDA)
9.       Richard Barton (Algorithmics)
 
Apologies:
1.       Tom Brown (OMGEO)
2.       Jesse Nolan (UBS)
 
 
Summary
·         IN1 Interest Notification – special scenario the group discussed the case where a specific cash collateral is both held and posted during an interest period. A couple of options were presented to represent gross and net treatments; the content model will need to support both the scenarios (standard, single cash payment & cash movement in both directions) à Richard and Lyteck will refine the proposal
 
·         Documentation The group reviewed the high-level documentation for the Substitution and Interest Processes that will be included in FpML 5.1 WD2 scheduled early October. More details will be added over the coming weeks and submitted to the group for review.
 
·         Evelyne mentioned the possible addition of an interest statement message for alignment with the ISO messages – to be discussed at the next meeting.
 
·         Substitution Process: Do we need to distinguish between variation margin and segregated independent amount for a substitution request? The group agreed to keep the content model unchanged as is readily allows for that common scenario. E.g., collateral substitution could be requested only for variation margin, for example.
               
Next meeting – Wednesday, September 22
 



The information contained in either this email and, if applicable, the attachment, are confidential and are intended only for the recipient. The contents of either the email or the attachment may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at isda@xxxxxxxx <mailto:isda@xxxxxxxx> then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies thereof. This communication is part of an ISDA process and is not intended for unauthorized use or distribution.

___________________________________________________________
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.

Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H  for additional disclosures.