|
See Pierre Lamy’s e-mail below. Regards, From: Lamy, Pierre [mailto:pierre.lamy@xxxxxx]
Elaine, On behalf of Rosh
Joseph, who is unavailable today, I am sending you a proposal for an
alternative representation of the commodity underlyer. That way, people
will have chance to look at it ahead of your next meeting. This is as a
follow-up from concerns that Rosh expressed earlier in the week, in relation to
the fact that the current underlyer representation seemed to be focused on
listed index underlyers (as it extends the ExchangeTraded type), leading
to a possible scope/usage confusion in relation to the existing index
construct. The alternative
construct that we propose aims at covering the various sets of commodity
underlyers (listed index, OTC index and physicals). Because of time constraints
we did not had a chance to fully develop the two schemes that we suggest to
have, nor to write all appropriate schema definitions. We would do this
if the group considers this approach as a viable avenue. Regards, |
Attachment:
AlternativeCommodityUnderlyer.zip
Description: AlternativeCommodityUnderlyer.zip