|
Dial in details for the meeting tomorrow, Wednesday October 3
at 11:00 a.m.: Us: 888 481 3032 Non US: 617 801 9600 Code: 28413758 Agenda: -
Factor for CDS after credit event -
Questions (see below) -
Progress on allocations -
AOB Kind regards, Marc Hi All, Adding further
to the below query, - Would it
possible to have a seperate set of validation rules for different
products falling under each category of IRD, CDS etc. for instance,
currently- when we need to identify only the validation rules w.r.t Plain
vanilla IRS - single currency/fixed vs float swap, we need to take
the entire set of Validation Rules - Rules for Interest Rate Derivatives
(IRD) and individually
identify as to which one is relevant to the above swap, or we need to take the
main schema - IRS and mark which
one is relevant. (Kindly advise
if there is any other method to do identify the relevant validation rules for
different products.) Thanks, Bhargavi WIPRO
Technologies 91-80-9980088904 From: Dear all I have couple of queries 1) Should the implementation of FpML be driven case sensitive 2) Why did the Novation message need to have the full details of the
Original Trade 3) Since there is no standard definition of Plain vanilla swap, How do
we decide what are out of scope messages. Or is it left to counter parties to
identify what is in scope and what is not. 4) The tool on the FpML website to validate the 4.2 message for schema
validation is not case sensitive. Please advise Regards Vinod Jain Wipro Technologies 212 815 5202 |