[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FpML-IRD RE: [fpml-coord] RE: FpML-CD PaymentSimple proposal



Title: PaymentSimple proposal
The idea that led me to propose this PaymentTypeEnum is to have a building block that would support the 'generic' payments as well the option premiums. 
As a result, I refactored the content of the PremiumTypeEnum with a 'Premium' suffix and the addition of that fee entry.
 
Thank you for your insight in relation to the adjustedPaymentDate.  In case we decide to keep it, my suggestion would be to position it as an extension of the AdjustableDateOrRelativeDateSequence:

<xsd:element name="paymentDate">

                                                <xsd:annotation>

                                                            <xsd:documentation xml:lang="en">The payment date. This date is subject to adjustment in accordance with any applicable business day convention.</xsd:documentation>

                                                </xsd:annotation>

                                                <xsd:complexType>

                                                            <xsd:complexContent>

                                                                        <xsd:extension base="AdjustableDateOrRelativeDateSequence">

                                                                                    <xsd:sequence>

                                                                                                <xsd:element name="adjustedPaymentDate" type="IdentifiedDate" minOccurs="0">

 


From: coord@xxxxxxxx [mailto:coord@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy Gurden
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:59 PM
To: cdwg@xxxxxxxx; coord@xxxxxxxx; irdwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [fpml-coord] RE: FpML-CD PaymentSimple proposal

I recall an argument for adding adjustedPaymentDate into the original structure was to allow the ability to carry around both the rule for adjusting an adjusted date and the implied adjusted date for internal processing purposes, i.e. the adjustable date may specify date X subject to adj in accordance with Modified Following using New York business days and the adjustedPaymentDate structure would allow a place to specify what you’ve calculated that adjusted date to be.

 

Can you elaborate on the meanings of the proposed paymentTypeEnum values as I’m not following what the distinction of each is and what is driving this particular list. What is the value of providing such a classification if the goal here is to create a much simplified structure?

 

Guy

 


From: cdwg@xxxxxxxx [mailto:cdwg@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lamy, Pierre
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:51 PM
To: coord@xxxxxxxx; irdwg@xxxxxxxx; cdwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: FpML-CD PaymentSimple proposal

 

Attached is a proposal to develop a simplified version of the Payment construct, which would be used (to start with) to support both the option on CDS and bond/CB underlyers as well as the payment associated with the cancellable and extendible provisions of the ird schema.

The image below presents the features of this construct, while the schema integrates into our work in progress on the options front.

Eliminated features from the Payment type:
- settlementInformation (which we agreed do not belong to the contract description)
- adjustmentPaymentDate (which should be tackled through the NONE entry for the date adjustment)

Open questions for the group:
- I have the sense that both AdjustableDateOrRelativeDate and AdjustableDateOrRelativeDateSequence would meet the need for the relative date construct.  Which one is more appropriate?

- Are we comfortable with the proposed PaymentTypeEnum enumeration:
                <xsd:restriction base="xsd:token">
                        <xsd:enumeration value="PrePaidPremium"/>
                        <xsd:enumeration value="FixedPremium"/>
                        <xsd:enumeration value="Fee"/>
                        <xsd:enumeration value="PostPaidPremium"/>
                        <xsd:enumeration value="Premium"/>
                        <xsd:enumeration value="VariablePremium"/>
                </xsd:restriction>

 

<<PaymentSimple.png>>

<<CDS Option - 20070116 PostWGMeeting.zip>>

This is a commercial communication sent by SwapsWire Limited.
 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
 
Company Details
SwapsWire Limited is regulated by the Financial Services Authority
and is entered in the FSA's Register (FSA Reference Number 207294).
SwapsWire Limited is subject to Value Added Tax
(VAT Registration No 761 4444 34).
SwapsWire Limited is registered at Companies House, no: 4027741.
Registered Office: One Silk Street, London, EC2Y 8HQ
 
Contact information
If you have any questions in relation to this policy please contact us at:
Fountain House
130 Fenchurch Street
London EC3M 5DJ
Attn: Rachel Cunningham-Day, General Counsel
Telephone: 00-44-207-071-0133
Email:
Rachel.cunningham-day@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
If you currently receive marketing information from us which you would prefer not to receive in the future please email us at info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. All email messages sent to and from info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business.