[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FpML-IRD RE: Roll convention for Mexican IRS
Hi Marc,
The practice in the case of MXN swaps
with a calculation period frequency of 28 (or 91, or 182) days is to set
calculationPeriodFrequency/ollConvention = NONE. Please see past
correspondance on this point in the IRD-WG mail archive at: http://www.fpml.org/_wgmail/_irdwgmail/msg00103.html.
Please note, the attached sample implies
a stub because the period from 2010-12-14 to 2015-12-14 is not an integer
multiple of 28D. The sample needs to be corrected, either by specifying
the stub properties or by adjusting the term of the trade.
I suggest changing the maturity date
to 2015-12-08, giving a term of 1820 days = 65 x 28D periods. This
is a "natural" term for a MXN swap, which tend to be transacted
for terms comprising integer multiples of 13 x 28D calculation periods
(e.g. 13, 26, 39, 52, 65 ... periods) - although MXN swaps with initial
stubs (and more rarely, end stubs) are by no means uncommon.
Best regards,
Harry
__________________________________________________________________________
Harry McAllister | Information Architect | Fixed Income Architecture
| BNP Paribas
4R223 | 10 Harewood Avenue | London NW1 6AA
tel: +44 (0)20 7595 3416 | email : harry.mcallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Internet
MGratacos@xxxxxxxx
Sent by: irdwg@xxxxxxxx
23/06/2010 18:32
|
Please respond to
irdwg@xxxxxxxx |
|
|
To
| irdwg@xxxxxxxx
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| FpML-IRD RE: Roll convention for Mexican
IRS |
|
I put together an example of an MXN swap
following the lunar calendar. See attached. I'd like to publish it in the
specifications if there aren't objections to do so.
Thanks,
Marc
From: irdwg@xxxxxxxx [irdwg@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc Gratacos [MGratacos@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:55 PM
To: irdwg@xxxxxxxx
Subject: FpML-IRD Roll convention for Mexican IRS
I got a question from an implementer regarding
MXN swaps, which have a payment frequency of 28 days following the lunar
calendar. The question is regarding the roll convention for such swaps.
Would it be set up to NONE?
Thanks in advance,
Marc
___________________________________________________________
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited.
Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-845C5H for additional disclosures.
Attachment:
ird-ex34-MXN-swap.xml
Description: Binary data