|
All, There was a business call today and we had a review of the
original business validation rules that were agreed. The business came back with some updates – the rules
highlighted in yellow were the ones that were candidates for removal. Main points from the business group: 1.
We should not be comparing original amounts to
current amounts in business validation. There can be some swings in the
commitment and/or loan levels through the life of a facility and the two sets of
amounts are not necessarily comparable (e.g. prime based revolver with a lot of
activity upward and well as downward). 2.
We should add the ‘Number of days’
to the InterestAccrualPeriod since the start/end convention is not always clear.
Sometimes they are inclusive and other times they are exclusive (i.e. it seems
that there is no standard around it). ‘Number of days’ should be a
mandatory field. The suggestion was also made to have a tolerance factor in the
case of rounding issues between accrual period amounts and the overall interest
payment. 3.
Interest payment notices sometime contain adjustments
from previous periods. Today, these ‘netting’ amounts are included
in the latest notice. There should be a way of describing such an adjustment
amount. Regards, Bhavik Katira CEO TenDelta™ Fresh
insight. Pure logic. +1.917.582.4574 new
york +44.(0).7780.808732 london TenDelta™
provides business process consulting, technology design & education
services; specializing in the Syndicated Loan Market. Entrusted with
engineering innovative & logical solutions; we endeavor to deliver timely,
robust, cutting-edge solutions. Copyright
©2008-2009. TenDelta™ LLC (US), TenDelta™ Limited (UK). All
Rights Reserved. |
Attachment:
FpMLLoanValidationRules_Phase2.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet