thanks, Marc.
I’ve included this in the agenda for tomorrow’s meeting, which I
just circulated.
From: mtf@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:mtf@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Gratacos
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:37 AM
To: mtf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: PartyObjectIdentifer
As
discussed last week, this is a first attempt to introduce a new model for
identifiers. See attached diagrams. The assumptions I had in mind while putting
this together were:
- Disctintion between primary
identifiers and aliases.
- Kept an identifier block in the
context of a party (same as current partyTradeIdentifier) so you’d expect
one or more tradeIdentifier/eventIdentifier elements in message.
- Kept version identification.
Added it as an optional structure instead of a choice.
- Generic PartyObjectIdentifier
type for trades, events, contracts, or other objects.
Let
me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Marc