|
1) Yes, they could be moved. 2) It’s not really clear whether some of them should be schemes
instead of enums. I think that this is a question that should be discussed by
the WG and decided for the LCWD. Brian Lynn, CTO Global Electronic Markets, http://global-emarkets.com High-speed FpML matching, reconciliation,
and validation: From: Marc Gratacos
[mailto:MGratacos@xxxxxxxx] Hi, This is a minor thing but the mktenv
subschema contains some enumerations. Shouldn’t we move them to the fpml-enum subschema (which contains all the
enumerations in FpML).
The same applies to the pr-shared
subschema:
And to the riskdef
subschema:
A more general question is that should all of them be enumerations? I
am sorry if I am being naïve here but for example the interpolation enumeration
only contains a value. Is it possible that in the future we have to include
more? Thanks, Marc |