|
I don’t know how you can enforce this with
validation rules. Yes, we should update the documentation on the element to
make it a bit clearer. From: The issue says that the TradeValuationItem
should probably have only one partyTradeIdentifier, or there should be a rule
that if there is more than one partyTradeIdentifier, it should refer to the
same trade. The existing documentation on that item
says, “One or more trade identifiers needed to uniquely identify a
trade.” This implies that the multiple trade IDs are for the same
trade. I’m not sure if it’s possible to create a rule that enforces this.
Should we update the documentation on the
element to make this more explicit? - Brian From: Brian, See question posted in the issues list: http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=204
Kind Regards, -Marc +13472846531 **************************************************************************************************************************
The information contained in either this email and, if applicable, the
attachment, are confidential and are intended only for the recipient. The
contents of either the email or the attachment may not be disclosed or used by
anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any
use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at
isda@xxxxxxxx then delete the e-mail and all attachments and any copies
thereof. This communication is part of an ISDA process and is not intended for
unauthorized use or distribution.
************************************************************************************************************************** |