FpML Issues Tracker

1013: 5.0 Reporting View Validation Rules

July 27, 2010

closed

Minor

Always

Validation Rules

Admin

danieldui

Summary

The following validation rules were removed from Confirmation View and will be added to the Reporting View once the validation rules for Reporting View are created: - ref-14, ref-15, ref-16, ref-17 in reconciliation - ref-18 in mktenv - ref- 19, ref-22, ref-23, ref-24, ref-36 - in valuation and riskdef - ref- 20, ref-21 - in riskdef - ref- 31 - in mktenv and riskdef - ref- 37- in valuation, mktenv and riskdef

Notes:

  • danieldui

    08/03/10 5:24 pm

    We discussed this issue on 3 Aug meeting.

    The issue is on hold until validation rules for Reporting View are in scope.

  • iyermakova

    11/11/10 7:05 pm

    11-11-2010 FX WG has reviewed the issue. Irina Yermakova will updated as per schema changes and add invalid-ref-32-01. FX product model was added in FpML-WD-2

  • iyermakova

    11/11/10 7:26 pm

    The invalid-ref-32-01.xml was added to braches/FpML-5-1 and will be published with FpML-5-1-WD-3. The example was missing because FX Product model that is used in this example was missing in FpML 5-0.

  • danieldui

    07/05/11 10:14 am

    Discussed on 21 June 2011. Keep on hold until Confirmation view issues are resolved.

  • danieldui

    06/25/13 3:49 pm

    This should be a duplicate of 1155 and 1164.

    We decided to deal with 1155 and 1164 first and then to check if anything that this issue mentions is not covered.

  • mgratacos

    09/06/19 5:03 am

    AWG 2019-09-05

    • We now have business rules for Reporting View with the separation of business processes between Confirmation and Reporting.
    • The issue needs to be updated.
  • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.