Latest Posts

The current ln-19: ” ln-19 (Mandatory) Context: DrawdownNotice (complex type) [drawdownEventType = RateSetEvent] [exists(loanContract)] loanContract/currentInterestRatePeriod/interestRate and loanContract/currentInterestRatePeriod/margin and loanContract/currentInterestRatePeriod/allInRate and loanContract/currentInterestRatePeriod/interestDayBasis and loanContract/currentInterestRatePeriod/indexTenor must exist. ” As written this is the XPath “and” of the contents of an element with another. This isn’t what is meant in the rule. “exists()” should be used as a … Continued

invalid-ln-18-01.xml is invalid against ln-13 and ln-17 and valid against ln-18. Please correct it so it is valid against all rules except ln-18.

The test file invalid-ln-17-01.xml is invalid against ln-13. The file should only be invalid against ln-17. Please make the test file valid against ln-13.

The sample file invalid-ln-16-01.xml is invalid against ln-13. According to the FpML Manual each sample must be invalid against only the one rule it tests, in this case ln-13. Please correct invalid-ln-16-01 so it is valid against ln-13.

ln-16 tries to get the typed value of two elements with element only content. i.e. the elements contain other elements so you cannot compare them other than as sets, which is presumably not what is meant. The rule today is: ” ln-16 (Mandatory) Context: DrawdownNotice (complex type) [exists(facilityCommitmentPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount)] [same-currency((facilityCommitmentPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount,drawdownPayment/shareLoanContractAmount))] drawdownPayment/shareLoanContractAmount

The sample invalid-ln-14 is invalid against ln-13. According to the FpML Manual it must only be invalid against the one rule it tests. Please fix the sample so that it is only invalid against ln-13.

ln-15 has undefined precedence for the different clauses. The rule today is: ” ln-15 (Mandatory) Context: DrawdownNotice (complex type) [exists(dealIdentifier/creditAgreementDate)] loanContract/effectiveDate and drawdownPayment/paymentDate >= dealIdentifier/creditAgreementDate. ” “loanContract/effectiveDate and drawdownPayment/paymentDate” returns in XPath true if both elements exist. “drawdownPayment/paymentDate >= dealIdentifier/creditAgreementDate” returns true if an element in the first path occurs in the second. What is … Continued

The invalid example invalid-ln-12-01.xml is not triggered by ln-12. The rule today is: ” ln-12 (Mandatory) Context: FacilityNotice (complex type) [facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition exists] [same-currency((facilityCommitmentPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount/amount,//facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount/amount)) = True] facilityCommitmentPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount/amount >= the sum of all facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/priorAmount/shareAmount/amount. ” The example does not contain an element of type FacilityNotice. Please fix the example or rule as appropriate.

The invalid example invalid-ln-11-01.xml is not triggered by ln-11. The rule today is: ” ln-11 (Mandatory) Context: FacilityNotice (complex type) [facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition exists] [same-currency((facilityCommitmentPosition/currentAmount/shareAmount/amount,//facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/currentAmount/shareAmount/amount)) = True] facilityCommitmentPosition/currentAmount/shareAmount/amount >= the sum of all facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/currentAmount/shareAmount/amount. ” The example does not contain an element of type FacilityNotice. Please fix the example or rule as appropriate.

ln-10 refers to the element facilityIdentifier. This element does not exist anywhere in FpML. Please correct ln-10. The rule today: ” ln-10 (Mandatory) Context: FacilityNotice (complex type) [facilityIdentifier/originalCommitmentAmount exists] [facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/loanContractSummary/originalAmount exists] [same-currency((facilityIdentifier/originalCommitmentAmount,facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/loanContractSummary/originalAmount)) = True] facilityIdentifier/originalCommitmentAmount/amount >= facilityCommitmentPosition/loanContractPosition/loanContractSummary/originalAmount/amount. “