Please note that the FpML website will be down for maintenance from 6-8pm, New York time, on December 7, 2023. For further information email info@fpml.org
Some of the equity examples (and test cases based on those examples) contain the element with a TODO value. If we include the element, should we at least add a value that has business meaning?
As per Eqd WG Meeting (Fri 14 March 2008): “remove use of element in example to resolve http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=521”
The change is committed to 4-4 (trunk) and 5-0 (branches/FpML-5-0)
Use this section to formally log validated discrepancies, agreed‑upon schema enhancements, or change requests that require Working Group review.
Before submitting an issue, please ensure the topic has been discussed in the FpML Community Hub.
Forum discussions help confirm the nature of the problem, shape the proposal, and build early consensus—greatly improving the clarity and efficiency of the formal issue‑resolution process.
Issues raised here will progress through the appropriate Working Groups and committees as part of the structured governance process.
By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.
Notes:
mgratacos
12/28/07 10:35 am
Query sent to Equity Derivatives Working Group:
Hi all,
Some of the equity examples (and test cases based on those examples) contain the element with a TODO value. If we include the element, should we at least add a value that has business meaning?
http://www.isda.org/publications/isdacredit-users.html
Thanks in advance,
-Marc
matthewdr
02/26/08 1:16 pm
Reassigning to EQDWG to provide a realistic example.
iyermakova
03/24/08 2:38 pm
As per Eqd WG Meeting (Fri 14 March 2008): “remove use of element in example to resolve http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=521”
The change is committed to 4-4 (trunk) and 5-0 (branches/FpML-5-0)