FpML Issues Tracker

848: ird-11 requires clarification

September 18, 2008

closed

Minor

Always

Validation Rules

Admin

None

Summary

The issues with ird-11 are identical to those with ird-10.

Notes:

  • matthewdr

    12/09/08 2:18 pm

    Agreed at the VWG that Matthew will make a proposal.

  • matthewdr

    12/09/08 3:53 pm

    The solution is:

    ”
    ird-11 (Mandatory)
    Prescise Description
    Context: element(*, CalculationPeriodDates)
    Rule: dayFromDate((lastRegularPeriodEndDate, terminationDate/unadjustedDate)[1]) = min(calculationPeriodFrequency/rollConvention, dayFromDate(functx:last-day-of-month((lastRegularPeriodEndDate, effectiveDate/unadjustedDate)[1])))
    ”

  • lyteck

    12/09/08 8:11 pm

    – implemented proposed formal description
    – kept original English description (may need revisiting)

    Should function dayFromDate() actually be day-from-date()?

  • matthewdr

    12/10/08 10:16 am

    tested, passed, closed

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    Use this section to formally log validated discrepancies, agreed‑upon schema enhancements, or change requests that require Working Group review.

    • Before submitting an issue, please ensure the topic has been discussed in the FpML Community Hub.
    • Forum discussions help confirm the nature of the problem, shape the proposal, and build early consensus—greatly improving the clarity and efficiency of the formal issue‑resolution process.
    • Issues raised here will progress through the appropriate Working Groups and committees as part of the structured governance process.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue