1300: relativeEffectiveDate, relativeTerminationDate

Good evening dear FpML experts. I have a question about the relativeEffectiveDate and relativeTerminationDate elements. Is there any restriction regarding the simultaneous use of, for example, such a combination of elements: 1) for fixed leg <relativeEffectiveDate> 2) for floating leg <effectiveDate> (adjustableDate) And vice versa. Is it possible to use relative choice in one leg and the … Continued

1299: different notional amounts IRSfixed/float

Good evening dear FpML experts. I have a question regarding example 2.45 Example 37 (IRSfixed/float). The example contains the following pieces of code: 1) for fixed leg <calculationPeriodAmount> <knownAmountSchedule> <initialValue>7,000,000</initialValue> <currency>EUR</currency> </knownAmountSchedule> </calculationPeriodAmount>   2) for floating leg <calculation> <notionalSchedule> <notionalStepSchedule> <initialValue>6,000,000</initialValue> <currency>EUR</currency> </notionalStepSchedule> </notionalSchedule> I have the following questions: 1) Is it a mistake … Continued

1298: bermuda exercise date via relativeDates

Hello dear experts, Could you please help me to clarify a bit the next question. Will religious holidays (Good Friday, Easter Monday) be taken into account for calculation bermuda exercise date via choice relativeDates ? The input data is following:   cash settlement payment date element  <cashSettlementPaymentDate id=”cashSettlementPayment0″> <adjustableDates> <unadjustedDate>2023-04-12</unadjustedDate> <dateAdjustments> <businessDayConvention>FOLLOWING</businessDayConvention> <businessCenters> <businessCenter>GBLO</businessCenter> <businessCenter>EUTA</businessCenter> … Continued

1294: adjustedDates bermudaExercise

Hello, Could you please clarify the next: When adding the new additional element adjustedDate into /dataDocument/trade/swaption/bermudaExercise/relevantUnderlyingDate/relativeDates/adjustedDate to have more than one adjustedDates (as it is Bermuda exercise style) the validator (Altova XML Spy) doesn`t allow to do it and demands to delete it. Is this an issue with the schema, or if not, how can … Continued

1293: Represent Accumulators and Decumulators as products

This item is a proposal to represent Accumulators and Decumulators as products in their own right, with a product representation that has the specific attributes that would provide a rich/fuller picture of this product. This was attempted by the EQD working group in 2015 but did not have reach a quorum: [FpML-EQDWG] Meeting / Teleconference … Continued

1292: Represent Accumulators and Decumulators as products

This item is a proposal to represent Accumulators and Decumulators as products in their own right, with a product representation that has the specific attributes that would provide a rich/fuller picture of this product. This was attempted by the EQD working group in 2015 but did not have reach a quorum: [FpML-EQDWG] Meeting / Teleconference … Continued

1291: Clarify FormulaComponent/@name

The complexType FormulaComponent has an attribute “name” of type NormalizedString,  described as “The name attribute points to a value used in the math element. ” In the next major version of FpML, it should be clarified whether it is a reference to an element identified by an intra-document reference and so can remain an attribute, … Continued