FpML Issues Tracker

1299: different notional amounts IRSfixed/float

May 22, 2023

closed

Tweak

N/A

Examples/Test Cases

XAPWG

MAZA

None

Summary

Good evening dear FpML experts.

I have a question regarding example 2.45 Example 37 (IRSfixed/float).

The example contains the following pieces of code:

1) for fixed leg

<calculationPeriodAmount>

<knownAmountSchedule>

<initialValue>7,000,000</initialValue>

<currency>EUR</currency>

</knownAmountSchedule>

</calculationPeriodAmount>

 

2) for floating leg

<calculation>

<notionalSchedule>

<notionalStepSchedule>

<initialValue>6,000,000</initialValue>

<currency>EUR</currency>

</notionalStepSchedule>

</notionalSchedule>

I have the following questions:

1) Is it a mistake that the example contains different notional amounts of 7,000,000 and 6,000,000, respectively for different legs ? Can IRSfixed/float contain different notional according to the FpML schema ? It seems that in practice there is such a possibility, in particular, this is what Google says.

 

2) Am I correct in my understanding that the element  <knownAmountSchedule> can be used only and only for fixed legs. At the same time, the notionalSchedule element can be used for both floating and fixed legs?

 

Thank you in advance and hope for cooperation as usual.

Best regards,

Maksym

Notes:

  • MAZA

    09/12/23 2:40 am

    UPD: Q#2 resolved.

  • mgratacos

    03/19/24 11:10 am

    The example is correct. There is no notional amount for the fixed leg. This is Zero Coupon Swap so in the fixed leg there is a known amount, which is the result of the calculation of the notional times the fixed rate during the period of the swap. It’s a zero coupon so the know amount payment is at the end of the contract.

  • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.