FpML Issues Tracker

1009: Message Naming: Noun vs. verbs

May 20, 2010

closed

Minor

Always

Schema

Admin

mgratacos

Summary

See attached Word file containing the description of the issue.

Attachments

  • Message Naming Issue.docx

    • Notes:

  • mgratacos

    05/20/10 1:39 pm

  • milasx

    05/21/10 8:39 am

    I agree, my mistake, it should be like Peter says.

    Thanks

    Simone

  • iyermakova

    05/21/10 12:34 pm

  • mgratacos

    06/22/10 3:05 pm

    The AWG has agreed that no changes will be made to the naming of the current messages in FpML 5.0 although the documentation and internal schema type heirarchy should be reviewed to see if any improvement can be made. The attached spreadsheet summarizes the voting of the members on the call and those who registered an opinion by mail beforehand.

    I will report the groups position to the standards committee next week. The group will meet again in two weeks to review the message type hierarchy.

    Andrew Jacobs, Chair AWG
    Director, HandCoded Consulting Ltd.
    Director, HandCoded Software Ltd.

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    Use this section to formally log validated discrepancies, agreed‑upon schema enhancements, or change requests that require Working Group review.

    • Before submitting an issue, please ensure the topic has been discussed in the FpML Community Hub.
    • Forum discussions help confirm the nature of the problem, shape the proposal, and build early consensus—greatly improving the clarity and efficiency of the formal issue‑resolution process.
    • Issues raised here will progress through the appropriate Working Groups and committees as part of the structured governance process.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue