260: Incorrect definition of Party

The party definition in fpml-doc-4-2.xsd at /xsd:schema/xsd:complexType/xsd:complexContent/xsd:extension/xsd:sequence/xsd:element/xsd:annotation/xsd:documentation is incorrect. It states: “The parties obligated to make payments from time to time during the term of the trade. This will include, at a minimum, the principal parties involved in the swap or forward rate agreement. Other parties paying or receiving fees, commissions etc. must also be … Continued

259: Missing definition of what a scheme is

There is no definition of what a scheme is and how it is to be used within the manual. For example I had a user add a scheme for a “parent account”, and “child account”, and “currency scheme” within a party’s Account in a trade. There needs to be a rule in the manual that … Continued

255: identifier should be renamed paymentId

A global type describing the payment exposed to the matching process, along with its gross component(s) and calculation details. Unique identifier assigned by either party or matching service, as agreed, to a payment.

254: paymentAmount should be renamed amount

paymentAmount should be renamed amount. The word “payment” is redundant. A global type describing the payment exposed to the matching process, along with its gross component(s) and calculation details. Unique identifier assigned by either party or matching service, as agreed, to a payment.

253: Support for order driven markets

FpML currently supports placing an order with a single market participant. We need FpML to support placing an order with a market. The main additional type will be the taking of the order from the market.

252: Zombie coding scheme

credit-seniority-trading is a coding scheme that contains two values – its contents declare that it “Specifies the seniority of the reference obligation used in a single name credit default swap trade”. There is however no defined type in FpML that lists this coding scheme as its default. So we do not know if there is … Continued

249: W3C WSDL group advise distinct root elements per message

________________________________________ From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh Sent: 20 October 2006 21:57 To: matthew.d.rawlings@jpmchase.com Cc: ylafon@w3.org; Steve Ross-Talbot; stabet@ruleml.org; public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to identify an element Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a CR078 [1]. The Working … Continued

246: Missing Bus Messages

Part of the Messaging Layer: BusinessMessage ConsistentStateMessage DestroyUniverseOfInterest EventMarkerRequest MessageAccepted MessageConsumed MessageDelivered MessageHandled MessagesConsumedByAll MessagesHandledByAll NotYetConsistent RegisterUniverseOfInterest RequestReply