FpML Issues Tracker

1012: The 5-x Confirmation View Validation rules ref-10, ref-30, ref-32 need new invalid test-cases

July 27, 2010

closed

Minor

Always

Validation Rules

Admin

mkoli

Summary

The 5-x Confirmation View Validation rules ref-10, ref-30, ref-32 need new invalid test cases: the existing invalid cases have the following issues: - invalid-ref-10-01 (currently used in requestValuationReport message) - invalid-ref-30-01 (currently used in valuationDocument message) - invalid-ref-32-01 (currently used in fx product )

Attachments

  • invalid-ref-30-01.xml

    • Notes:

  • danieldui

    08/03/10 5:21 pm

    We discussed this issue on 3 Aug meeting.

    Andrew Jacobs is now the owner.

  • iyermakova

    11/11/10 7:29 pm

    The invalid-ref-32-01.xml was added to braches/FpML-5-1 and will be published with FpML-5-1-WD-3. The example was missing because FX Product model that is used in this example was missing in FpML 5-0.

  • danieldui

    07/05/11 12:35 pm

    Checked on 5 July 2011.

    rules ref-10 and ref-30 don’t have an invalid test case.

  • jordibarcelo

    02/21/13 2:33 pm

    Added examples for the 5-x Confirmation View Validation rules ref-10 and ref-30 invalid test-cases.

  • danieldui

    02/26/13 3:17 pm

    ACTION: ISDA/Maithili check examples provided and, if OK, include them in repository.

  • mkoli

    03/11/13 7:19 pm

    Checked the invalid example test cases and Added test cases in source safe.

  • mkoli

    03/11/13 7:20 pm

    updated and available in 5.5 TR

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    The FpML Issues Tracker is designed to facilitate public interaction in the standard.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue