FpML Issues Tracker

1066: PartyRoleType should NOT be available in Confirmation view

September 27, 2011

closed

Major

Have not tried

Business Process

Admin

mgratacos

Summary

The current definition of PartyRoleType seems specific to the reporting views but it is available in the Confirmation view too. The current scheme only has two values: AllPositions and SomePositions, which only make sense in position report context.

I'd suggest making the type element within RelatedParty available only to the Reporting view.

Notes:

  • mgratacos

    09/28/11 10:18 am

    I looked at this, Marc, but when I looked at it, it seemed that that field has been in confirmation view since 5.0. To remove it now would require an exception to the change control guidelines by the Standards Committee. I didn’t want to propose that without a formal vote of the working group.

    Brian

    Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

  • mgratacos

    10/24/11 10:12 am

    Since this was already in version 5.0 the Business Process Working decided not to fix this issue.

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    The FpML Issues Tracker is designed to facilitate public interaction in the standard.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue